A fascinating story is on BBC News just now that a man suffering what is known as locked-in syndrom (essentially paralysis of pretty much everything except the eyes) is seeking clarification on the guidance for mercy-killing prosecutions. Potentially likely to bring the whole right-to-die argument back into the media once more, this time with a different tac to it. The claim here is that others are able (physically) to commit suicide should they decide to. This chap is not, because of his condition. So does the existing law over mercy killing infringe his rights?
I would find it hard to argue against him. He’s clearly sound of mind and has been able to express his wishes. A quirk of law prevents him achieving his objectives. Should society force him to stay alive? I for one am not convinced that it should.
Recent Comments
- pagangka on Mouldy Bread
- hilongos on Mouldy Bread
- fred thomas on Fish
- Lulu on Mouldy Bread
- Mark Waters on bblogreader
Blogroll
Ads by Google
Site Search
