<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress 2.7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.misthaven.org.uk/blog/2008/12/13/wordpress-27/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.misthaven.org.uk/blog/2008/12/13/wordpress-27/</link>
	<description>Tech News, Random Stuff, WordPress, and things going mouldy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 15:02:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pozy</title>
		<link>http://www.misthaven.org.uk/blog/2008/12/13/wordpress-27/comment-page-1/#comment-1087</link>
		<dc:creator>Pozy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 09:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.misthaven.org.uk/blog/?p=1436#comment-1087</guid>
		<description>It is best version Wordpres ever !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is best version Wordpres ever !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrmist</title>
		<link>http://www.misthaven.org.uk/blog/2008/12/13/wordpress-27/comment-page-1/#comment-1070</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrmist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 21:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.misthaven.org.uk/blog/?p=1436#comment-1070</guid>
		<description>Generally you hit fewer issues if you upgrade in small increments (e.g no more than one point release at a time) than if you try to go from, say 2.3 directly to 2.7.   

The main reason being that fewer people test the big upgrade leaps.  In theory they should all be ok, but there have been problems in the past for people who&#039;ve done big jumps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally you hit fewer issues if you upgrade in small increments (e.g no more than one point release at a time) than if you try to go from, say 2.3 directly to 2.7.   </p>
<p>The main reason being that fewer people test the big upgrade leaps.  In theory they should all be ok, but there have been problems in the past for people who&#8217;ve done big jumps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hardeep Singh</title>
		<link>http://www.misthaven.org.uk/blog/2008/12/13/wordpress-27/comment-page-1/#comment-1068</link>
		<dc:creator>Hardeep Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 12:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.misthaven.org.uk/blog/?p=1436#comment-1068</guid>
		<description>Why do you say upgrading in steps is better?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you say upgrading in steps is better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/12 queries in 0.014 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 255/275 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.misthaven.org.uk @ 2012-02-09 05:07:40 -->
